Who, Why and How of Forcible Christian ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUGS OF ABUSE (AODA) Treatment

While at a convention for addictions treatment professionals, I listened to an ex-priest extol the virtues of inclusiveness in treatment while shaming the "exclusivity" of particular faith based treatment modalities. Blameless a hardly any months earlier, I was in a buzz session of "Christian Counselors" referring to Alcoholics Nameless as a cult where a "door knob" could be the higher influence that helped conduct a drunk on the sober road while citing the Humanist Manifestos agenda to convert Christianity with the religion of "mind science." Meanwhile, back at the ranch, multifarious psychologists, psychiatrists, and researchers hold attempted to blame Western Civilizations organised religions for all the more of the neurosis and dysfunction establish in manifold families and individuals. These extreme, myopic, and misinformed views arrange the backdrop to a still misunderstood treatment consumer group. The needs of this chain and the direct approaches to conclave those needs testament be briefly discussed in this introductory piece.

SPECIAL NEEDS GROUPS

A Incident of Trust

Mary is a 43 year-old divorced and remarried brobdingnagian of two sons from her basic wedding of six years, and a daughter from her moment marriage of nine years. Mary reports having been hit and "cheated on" by her high-school sweetheart fundamental spouse she met in church camp. Her mum was an alcoholic and Mary states one of her mothers' boyfriends molested her while "Mom" was passed outside drunk. Mary presents as blooming stagy and hale groomed with a strained smile and obvious clouded circles (mask of depression) all over her eyes. Mary describes having disappeared transitority custody of her cardinal two children, during her inaugural marriage, when adjacent the admonition of her church elders to repay to stay with her husband in spite of his drunkenness and violence. Her neighbours had called Baby Protective Services and resident Megalopolis Police during one principally booming and fiery episode. Mary and her antecedent husband were ordered to court mandated parenting and conniption control classes. Mary was subsequent referred to a Psychiatrist, placed on Valium and Prozac, and moved to a battered womens shelter and divorced her aboriginal husband. Her church rule blamed secular counseling and the courts for Marys divorce, she claimed. Mary changed church denominations and church membership. Mary met her second husband at a church "divorce recovery" workshop a year after joining the original church body. Meanwhile, Marys handle of Valium had escalated from "5 mg, as needed, not to exceed 10 mg per day," to "10 mgs. three times everyone generation and 15 mgs each evening before bed." Mary had further started having wine with dinner next her anterior divorce. She is these days consuming eight to ten "mini-vodka" bottles each day. Marys husband blames secular psych for Mary's increased anxiety and addictions to Valium and alcohol. Mary and her second husband are looking for an competent "Substance Abuse/Dual-diagnosis" treatment facility.

This minor vignette alludes to crowded facets of fundamentalist Christians fears of our post-modern secular humanist approaches to lifes vagaries. Mary has "special needs" as a abeyant AODA treatment consumer. Would this client account from entering a "typical" AODA or dual-diagnosis treatment facility? Would she, or her husband, all the more Favor placing her in such an environment? Provided "trust" is the door that opens to bonding with her counselors and peers in a treatment setting, what are MARYS needs in grouping to father trust? While it would be accessible for a "new-ager" to sit in experience of Marys religiosity, is it not this especial alike benign of judging these inexperienced agers profess to oppose? Would an "enlightened" new-ager propose a Jet person female client "just confer it a chance to work" whether she requested growth sent to a primarily Black-staffed treatment effortlessness specializing in "African American" acculturation issues IN LIEU of admitting into the community "one size-fits-all" all-Caucasian staffed "New-Age-4-U" district treatment center?
Clinically Sound-The Good, the Defective and the Ugly

There are big arrays of AODA treatment centers, which affirm to be Bible, or Faith based. With Teen Challenge, The Salvation Army, Transformation House, Uncle-Bobs-God Building (contrived,) how are referring clinicians and viable clients to discern the difference?

In multiplied "Christian Treatment Centers," exorbitant guilt, shame, and obsession with "sin" concepts one's all to mold nickels finished creating spiritual and volitional discomfort at the indubitable notion of relapsing into substance using/abusing patterns. These methodologies abort any attempts to appreciate the motives, wants and needs clients may be attempting to fulfil concluded addictive lifestyles. Clinically sound modalities, Christian based or not, fathom that community execute behaviors for inured sets of motives or goals! Conversely, ignoring "sin," or coinciding concepts, prevents clients from facing their immoral/amoral behaviors and their effects. Every healthful treatment ideology includes "inventorying" opposite behaviors, their effects, motives, expressions of regret/remorse and corrective thinking, feeling, behaving and deserved restitution.

The "automaton" syndrome is another fix of troubling foibles. Recovering FROM addictions and RECOVERING the self depend upon preferable "self-hood" than activity local to quoting or paraphrasing a book, no event how consecrated and inspired that subject may be. Christs admonition to,
"Matt 22:37-40

37 And He replied to him, You shall adoration the Lord your Infinite spirit with all your feelings and with all your soul and with all your attitude (intellect). [Deut 6:5.] 38 This is the colossal (most important, principal) and first off commandment. 39 And a second is analogous it: You shall delight your neighbour as [you do] yourself. [Lev 19:18.] 40 These two commandments lsum up and upon them depend all the Enactment and the Prophets."

makes it clear; we are to develop, be aware and be cognizant of our Bona fide self. Clinically in need "Christian" programs are feasible to miss this speck and situate for creating devout automatons. Forgiving and lifetime able to instance and handle scriptural precepts is an critical bite of Christian treatment. Obsession with sin and the Bible does not equate with recovery.

Another existence of query for "Christian" programs and counselors is one of documentation and outcomes measurements. One of the ten "Counselor Certifying" bodies recognized by the California Government Branch of Alcohol and Narcotic programs has resisted any requirement involving documenting treatment practices, client success and outcomes measurements. Clinically sound Bible based treatment understands the scriptural grounds for accountability. Scientific methods are NOT the enemy of sound clinical Bible based therapies. This topic is far besides expansive to label in this article.

Many Christian consumers cold feet the imaginable "faith undermining" theories, techniques, foundations, beliefs and practices of secular or humanistic based treatment programs. Cogent and clinically sound "faith based" programs can and conclude exist. They are a necessity from a place marketing perspective and a human mercy vantage point. Divers "in need" Christians quality hopeless. They are left with the options of vitality spiritually abused "into Recovery" or career treated in programs that effect not cognize their sui generis needs. Fortunately, many clinically sound Christian Programs chalk up be reformed available. The above average sets us apart.

HUMANIST MANIFESTO

From Wikipedia, the paper encyclopedia

Humanist Manifesto is the nickname of three manifestos laying elsewhere a Humanist worldview. They are the virgin Humanist Manifesto (1933, usually referred to as Humanist Manifesto I), the Humanist Manifesto II (1973), and Humanism and Its Aspirations (2003, a.k.a. Humanist Manifesto III). The Manifesto originally arose from religious Humanism, though secular Humanists extremely signed.
The central burden of all three is the elaboration of a philosophy and price system, which does not necessarily embrace view in any personal deity or "higher power," although the three differ substantially in their tone, form, and ambition. Each has been signed at its set off by heterogeneous prominent academics and others who are in habitual treaty with its principles.

For extra information, contact Rev. Matthew Weyuker MA, CADC II at Transformation Castle (WomensChristianRecovery.com) 1-877-900-7326
Or Mollifying Hills treatment center.
Blazer, Lisa and Ryan, "Psychology Debunked" (Creation Crib Press, 2002) pgs. 1-241
Bluckley, Ed, "Why Christians Can't gospel truth Psychology" (Harvest House, 1993) pgs. 47-258
Ellis, Albert, "The Dispute Against Religion: A Psychotherapist's View" (New York: School for Analytical Living, 1971)
Ellis, Albert, "There Is No District for the Conceit of Sin in Psychotherapy," Magazine of Counseling Psychology 7 (1960): pgs.188-192
Lowinson, Ruiz, Millman, and Langrod, "Substance Abuse: A Adequate Textbook, Fourth Edition," (Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2005): pgs. 587-598, 653-670, 723-732, 763-771, 1286-1299
Schaeffer, Francis A., "The Entire Works of Francis A Schaeffer: A Christian Cosmos View: Book 5: A Christian Aspect of the West," (Crossway Books, 1982) pgs. 417-501
Yalom, Irvin D. with Leszcz, Molyn, "The Belief and Familiarity of Accumulation Psychotherapy: 5th Edition" (2005: Basic Books): pgs. 77-108